Skip to main content

NHibernate performance issues #4: slow query compilation - named queries

NHibernate provides many approaches how to query the database:
First three of these querying methods define the body of query in the other than native SQL. It implies that NHibernate must transform these queries into native SQL - according to given dialect, e.g. into native MS SQL query.

If you really want to develop all-times fast application the described process can present unpleasant behavior. How to avoid query compilation?

Compiled named queries

Its ridiculous but everyone met compiled (and named) query. If you have at least once browsed the log which NHibernate produced, you have had to meet similar set of lines:

2010-12-13 21:26:42,056 DEBUG [7] NHibernate.Loader.Entity.AbstractEntityLoader .ctor:0 Static select for entity eu.podval.NHibernatePerformanceIssues.Model.Library: SELECT library0_.Id as Id1_0_, library0_.version as version1_0_, library0_.Address as Address1_0_, library0_.Director as Director1_0_, library0_.Name as Name1_0_ FROM [Library] library0_ WHERE library0_.Id=?

When NHibernate starts (SessionFactory as bean in my case) he complies certainly usable queries. In displayed case, NHibernate knows that he'll probably search library entity in database by it's id so he'll generate native SQL query into internal cache and if the developer's code call Find for Library entity, he'll use exactly this pre-compiled select query in native SQL.

What's the main benefit? If you would call thousand times library's Find NHibernate would always has to compile the query. Instead of this inefficient behavior, NHibernate does it only once and uses pre-compiled version later.

How to speed you query? Use pre-complied named queries

As I've already written, NHibernate generates pre-compiled queries, stores them in the cache and uses them if necessary. NHibernate is the great framework, so he makes available such functionality even for you :-)

Simply you can declare list of HQL (or SQL) named queries within any mapping (hbm.xml) file, NHibernate loads the file, parse queries and preserves the pre-compiled version in his internal cache so called queries in runtime not have to be intricately parsed to native SQL, but he'll use already prepared ones.

How to use named queries?
  1. Define new hbm.xml file which will include your named queries, e.g. named-queries.hbm.xml
  2. Place this file within such assembly which NHibernate searches for hbm mapping files. Maybe you should have to update you Fluent NHibernate configuration to search for these files. Following code will do it for you or see FluentNHibernateSessionFactory.
Now, it's time to write your named-queries.hbm.xml file. It has the following structure.
<hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2">

  <query name="Book.with.any.Rental">
    select b from Book b
      where exists elements(b.Rentals)

How to use it?
IList<Book> books = SessionFactory.GetCurrentSession().GetNamedQuery("Book.with.any.Rental").List<Book>();

How is the speed up of named queries?

Lets say, I'll use Book.with.any.Rental query for any measures to we'll see how omitted query compilation improves test response.

I've executed the test for both named query and plain HQL. According to debug labels, plain HQL case spent 40ms by parsing of HQL to native SQL.

Note that all written till now applies only to the first call. NHibernate is tricky framework so he caches queries for you automatically when he compiles them for first time. Lets call method to get books with any rental two times (first level cache is cleared among the calls):
  • first call took 190ms
  • second one only 26ms 
It's also necessary to admit that database has also own query cache :-) The result is clear anyway.

What are real advantages of named queries?

It doesn't seem such brilliant think to moil with writing the queries in xml file. What are real benefits?
  1. Speed (of the first call) - described example save 40ms of method call. It doesn't seem so much. Imagine that you are developing huge project having almost hundred queries. It can save a lot of time! You should also notice that chosen query was very simple. According to my experiences, the compilation of more complicated query takes at least 200ms. It's not small amount of time when you develop very quick application
  2. HQL parse for error on startup - you'll find out that your query is correct or wrong at application's startup because NHibernate do these things when he starts. You haven't wait till the call of desired query
  3. Clean code - you aren't mixing C# code together SQL (HQL) code
  4. Possibility to change query code after the application compilation - consider that you can change your HQL or SQL even if application was already compiled. You can simply expose named query hbm.xml file as ordinary xml file and you can tune your queries at runtime - means without additional compilation
You can also see Series of .NET NHibernate performance issues to read all series articles.


Popular posts from this blog

NHibernate performance issues #3: slow inserts (stateless session)

The whole series of NHibernate performance issues isn't about simple use-cases. If you develop small app, such as simple website, you don't need to care about performance. But if you design and develop huge application and once you have decided to use NHibernate you'll solve various sort of issue. For today the use-case is obvious: how to insert many entities into the database as fast as possible? Why I'm taking about previous stuff? The are a lot of articles how the original NHibernate's purpose isn't to support batch operations , like inserts. Once you have decided to NHibernate, you have to solve this issue. Slow insertion The basic way how to insert mapped entity into database is: SessionFactory.GetCurrentSession().Save(object); But what happen when I try to insert many entities? Lets say, I want to persist 1000 libraries each library has 100 books = 100k of books each book has 5 rentals - there are 500k of rentals  It's really slow! The inser

Performance Battle of NoSQL blob storages #1: Cassandra

Preface We spend last five years on HP Service Virtualization using MsSQL database . Non-clustered server. Our app utilizes this system for all kinds of persistence. No polyglot so far. As we tuned the performance of the response time - we started at 700ms/call and we achieved couple milliseconds per call at the end when DB involved - we had to learn a lot of stuff. Transactions, lock escalation , isolation levels , clustered and non clustered indexes, buffered reading, index structure and it's persistence, GUID ids in clustered indexes , bulk importing , omit slow joins, sparse indexes, and so on. We also rewrite part of NHibernate to support multiple tables for one entity type which allows use scaling up without lock escalation. It was good time. The end also showed us that famous Oracle has half of our favorite features once we decided to support this database. Well, as I'm thinking about all issues which we encountered during the development, unpredictive behavio

Jenkins + git revision in all build names

Jenkins by default assigns version of a build using local counter within each type of a build. An example is better. When you look at this overview, you definitely do not know which code revision was used in Compile build and which in Integration Tests . I've followed nice article regarding real CI pipeline using jenkin s. It uses Build Name Setter Plugin. Unfortunately this article uses SVN revision number. So I said I'll just use git revision as git is my source control. But it's not so easy as how it could seem for first look. My Jenkins setup comprised of first compile build step which clones git server and performs an compilation. Second build steps clones the repository from first step and executes integration tests . The problem here is that the second step does not know which git revision compile step cloned. Here is list of steps how to do that. 1. You obviously need Git Plugin , Build Name Setter Plugin and Parameterized Trigger Plugin 2. Compile